Phenomenology of Prayer Chapter 8 Heidegger and the Prospect of a Phenomenology of Prayer

In this chapter, the main focus is based on the two early philosophers the authors mention, Wilhelm Dilthey and Marin Heidegger. Also in this chapter, the author mentions what phenomenology is and what it means to these two early philosophers. For Heidegger, "Heidegger conceived of phenomenology as a hermeneutral enterprise" (Benson and Wirzba, 119). He explains that prayer is at its best when it is home, and not being removed from it. I noticed how there are not only principles to hermeneutral but also contributions to it as well. What I learned from this chapter is that prayer comes from habits of waiting for God and to also serve the Lord as well.

Pages: 119-133
.Benson, Bruce Ellis, and Norman Wirzba. The Phenomenology of Prayer. Fordham University Press, 2005

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Swanson Kenosis and Prayer

December 6, 2018 [Phenomenology of Prayer] In the Phenomenology of Prayer , Benson and Wirzba express that the correct posture of prayer is kenosis, which is the intense decentering of self. Kenosis is important for prayer because it empties the mind of everything that is distracting to the consciousness and focuses full attention on God. When your mind is gravitating towards your schedules or other thoughts of the day and not directly in the moment, you further yourself from God and limit the possibility for clear communication. I tried to pray today using this method. In the beginning it was difficult to pray because I was limiting myself by believing it was foolish and childish, letting my ego get in the way. I realized this and then tried to clear my mind and not say anything instead. Once my mind was clear I felt a little more comfortable and tried again but was still distracted by some of my thoughts. Although I did not feel like I was having a genuine connection, my self ...
Read more

Morningstar Mythic Landscapes: The Mountain That was God

[Mount Tahoma: The Mountain That was God ] A unique analysis of the question what is this inner need we humans have for the mountain seen within? distinguishes   between the physical act of climbing a mountain versus symbolic climbing. Regardless of whether climbing that mountain is a physical experience or a figurative one, both involve a sort of overcoming, or a finding of oneself. The idea that the stillness and new life brought from this mountain deserves a gift in return; an appreciation or blessing in exchange for what it has brought to the observer/seeker. However the realization is that nothing humanly available could be enough to give to this place in return for the reawakening, and new life that has been granted. A detailed account of what the universe on this mountain was like and described in intricate detail stating "One could almost hear the roar of growth itself-water being heaved up a hundred feet through the phloem fibers in the trunks of trees, oxygen relent...
Read more

Lett- Own topic- #1

In reflection of the Pacific Crest Trail video, it's amazing to me how united every hiker seems to be. Once you're on the trail it's as if you are apart of a separate universe. In the normal universe, people are labeled by class or what job they have, but on the trail everyone is of equal status and is treated as human. It's beautiful. I loved listening to what motivated each one of the hikers to finish their journey and i loved seeing the reactions once they did reach the end. While i am not sure if i would be able to go on such a journey, videos like this definitely make one get motivated to complete a big task like this. The other thing that fascinated me was that while it seemed many of the hikers were united and taking this trip together, each journey is specific in it's own right. That is what interests me so much about the idea of Long distance hiking. It's very relateable to our everyday walk of life; we all have people we encounter over the course of ou...
Read more